FATTEN UP YOUR MIDDLE: PREPARING ANNUAL FUND DONORS TO BECOME MAJOR DONORS
With Catherine Heitz New
Every arts organization wants more major donors. Many are already giving to your Annual Fund.
This episode of Fundraising Growth Now! examines the “hourglass problem” and the opportunity to develop relationships with the critical donors in the middle between broad-based support and personally managed major gifts.
The focus is practical: identify promising donors, consider their engagement as well as their capacity, and give each priority relationship a meaningful next step.
Read the full transcript below or click the button to listen.
FATTEN UP YOUR MIDDLE
Preparing Annual Fund Donors to Become Major Donors
By Catherine Heitz New
Every arts organization wants more major donors. When fundraising goals rise, the conversation often turns to finding the next transformational gift. Who can make a six-figure commitment? Who can introduce us to a wealthy family? Those are reasonable pursuits, but they can also distract us from promising donors already supporting our organizations.
At RSC, we frequently see a donor pyramid with a broad base of Annual Fund supporters, a handful of well-cultivated major donors, and too little movement between the two. The result makes the donor base collectively look more like an hourglass than a pyramid. Strengthening the middle is essential to developing tomorrow’s major donors and correcting “the hourglass problem”.
The Annual Fund Builds the Pipeline
At RSC, we always return to the three fundamentals of sustainable fundraising: get donors, keep donors, and upgrade donors. The Annual Fund generates revenue today while building relationships that can lead to major gifts in the future. Donors experience the art, see the organization’s impact, develop trust, and may choose to increase their investment.
That progression requires attention. Organizations often work hard to acquire new annual donors and cultivate established major donors, while people giving meaningful amounts in between receive only standard appeals and acknowledgments. Their generosity is appreciated, but their relationships are rarely developed. A thin major-gift pipeline is often the consequence.
Find Your Middle
There is no universal mid-level gift amount. Depending on the organization, it might start at $500, $1,000, or $2,500. Review your donor pyramid. Where does broad-based Annual Fund fundraising end? Where does personal major-gift management begin? Who sits between them? Then ask whether you can name five donors in that group who might become major donors—and explain why. If you can't, that's where you should begin.
Capacity Is Not Readiness
Wealth screening can help identify capacity, but it does not establish a donor’s interest in making a larger commitment to your organization. Consider a donor who gives $1,000, attends several performances each year, responds to invitations, and has steadily increased their support. That person may be a better prospect than someone with considerable wealth but little connection to your work.
RSC considers capacity, propensity, relationship depth, and engagement with the art. Giving history, attendance, participation, and personal interactions help distinguish donors ready for an Ask from those who need further cultivation. The objective is to understand the relationship, not simply to rank people by wealth.
Make Donors Meeting-Ready
Identifying the mid-level donors with potential for a larger gift is only the first step towards making the Ask. Next, you must develop the relationship. Imagine: a Development Director invites a promising donor to coffee. No response. A second invitation also goes unanswered. The issue may be that the organization moved directly from mass communication to a personal meeting request without first establishing a personal connection.
Before donors are Ask-ready, they often need to become meeting-ready. A post-concert conversation, an invitation to an opening, or a personal note about a favorite education program can build that connection. Arts organizations already have meaningful experiences to share. They need not create another series of events to begin cultivating these donors.
Make Personal Cultivation Manageable
A Development staff of two cannot personally manage 300 mid-level donors. Start with a focused portfolio. An Executive Director might handle five to ten relationships, the Development Director ten to twenty, and a willing Board member two or three. Match assignments to genuine capacity and interest.
Give each priority donor two or three specific next steps. Record them, assign responsibility, and follow through. The immediate goal is not to turn a $1,000 gift into $10,000. It is to thoughtfully advance the relationship until a larger Ask is appropriate.
The upgrade is the outcome, not the strategy. Personal stewardship, genuine listening, and meaningful engagement make an upgrade possible.
Value the Donors Who Stay
Not every mid-level donor will become a major donor. Someone who contributes $2,500 annually for fifteen years demonstrates substantial loyalty and support. That relationship may also lead to a planned gift, an introduction, or Board service. Effective fundraising respects the donor’s interests and capacity rather than treating every renewal as a missed upgrade.
Take Another Look at Your Pyramid
Review your donor pyramid. Find the middle, identify your strongest prospects, and determine who will personally cultivate each relationship. Give those people a next step and make sure it happens. Major-gift growth depends on systematically developing the Annual Fund donors who have already chosen to support you.
If you'd like to discuss strengthening your donor pipeline, identifying promising upgrade prospects, or developing a more personalized cultivation strategy, RSC Associates would welcome the conversation. Helping arts and cultural organizations build lasting donor relationships and achieve sustainable fundraising growth is what we do every day.

